Glaring Contradiction

Filed Under: Canadian Affairs

More from the debate.

I’m glad that I’m not the only one to pick up on a remark by Paul Martin. On tax cuts:

“We believe that putting dollars into your hands and letting you decide how to spend it is the way to go.”

Does anyone else see the glaring contradiction? Blogging Tories member Babbling Brooks does.

 

9 Comments so far. Click here to join the discussion!

  1. Raging Ranter

    You misquoted Martin. What he actually said was:

    “We believe that putting your dollars into our own pockets and letting senior Liberal Party hacks decide how to spend it is the way to go.”


  2. freethinca

    “The fact is …. ” Mr. Harper is right!


  3. Paul MacPhail

    You weren’t the only one to pick up on that exchange. I went so far as to pull a Gurmant Grewal and record the debate, and that was either a lie or a senior’s moment that afflicted Mr. Martin. It was in total contradiction to his comments with regard to the Conservative plan for early childcare assistance.


  4. Len

    I wanted to record the debate as well but my VCR went kaput!


  5. Ann

    Interesting that Mr. Duceppe and Mr. Harper both referred to the book written by the former U.S. Ambassador to Canada - Paul Cellucci. In the book, Paul Martin’s statements about going to Iraq are recorded - contradicting what he said tonight, and also a record of Stephen Harper’s full reaction as events unfolded in Iraq - which is apparently consistent with what Mr. Harper has been saying all along. I’ll have to get the book…

    As far as Paul Martin’s “senior moment” which he seems to have frequently, he totally blew his answer to the question from the woman who was on disability for 20 years…Did you notice then when the next question came along, he just ignored the new question and tried to answer the previous question from the woman on disability. Sad…always one answer behind? Maybe I’ve been unkind. When watching the Question Period in the House, I find it quite frustrating when Martin et al seem to refuse to answer questions. Maybe he/they just don’t understand the questions?


  6. ann

    If anyone is interested, the book referred to tonight is UNQUIET DIPLOMACY - Paul Cellucci (former US Ambassador to Canada)


  7. Len

    “…he totally blew his answer to the question from the woman who was on disability for 20 years…”

    Oh yeah I noticed that. He was doing it all night. I could have put up a page and a half of such instances but I only posted a few of my favourites.


  8. Len

    BTW, thanks for mentioning the book Harper alluded to. I’ll look for it.


  9. Len

    “You misquoted Martin”

    You’re right RR. He hypnotized me.


Reply to “Glaring Contradiction”

Please note: Comment moderation is in effect. It may take some time for your comment to appear. There is no need to resubmit it.

Off-topic comments, personal attacks, obvious spam and support requests will likely not make it out of moderation. This site does not necessarily endorse or agree with comments left here.

 

Back On The Air!

Live weekly show featuring the movers and shakers of WordPress.

  • WordPress

Just Say No!

To themes using obfuscated code.

  • Say No to Obfuscated Code!

Powered By ...

Is there anything else? Anil...?

  • Powered by WordPress!